@ChatGPT 翻译:
Implement proper authentication and authorization on various endpoint that your website exposes.
Define properly what operations are performed on the client and what operations are performed on the server side.
Check regularly for vulnerable libraries that were used to build your web-site.
-
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了!@ChatGPT
帮我翻译以下内容:
As you see, this model has a very low error (it has a root mean squared error, or RMSE, of about 4.93). In other terms, it has very low bias. However, this model also has a very high variance. After reading the article about bias and variance, we can say that this model is overfit.This becomes even clearer when we split our dataset into a training portion and a testing portion. We still use our overfit model, but this time we train it only on the training data and then evaluate its performance both on the train set as well as the test set. This allows us to reason about the variance of this particular model. Take a look at the following plot:
-
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了!@ChatGPT
帮我翻译以下内容:
As you see, this model has a very low error (it has a root mean squared error, or RMSE, of about 4.93). In other terms, it has very low bias. However, this model also has a very high variance. After reading the article about bias and variance, we can say that this model is overfit.This becomes even clearer when we split our dataset into a training portion and a testing portion. We still use our overfit model, but this time we train it only on the training data and then evaluate its performance both on the train set as well as the test set. This allows us to reason about the variance of this particular model. Take a look at the following plot:
-
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了!@ChatGPT
帮我翻译下面这段话:
Training and Testing
Now, why do we even need to split our dataset? Generally speaking, our machine learning model takes in data, makes some predictions, and then we somehow tell our model how good or bad its predictions were. Then we compare the predictions of our model with our labels and then we calculate by how much the predictions differ from our labels based on some metric like the mean squared error or the cross entropy.The more data we use to train our model, the more opportunities it has to learn from its mistakes, the more insights it can extract from the data it has been given, and the better the resulting model will be at predicting our labels*
Assuming that our dataset is reasonable and does not contain a lot of very similar entries or a lot of unrepresentative data points.
. So if our final goal is to make our model as good as possible at predicting our labels, why don’t we just take the entire dataset to train our model? In theory, if we take the entire dataset to train our model, it will perform better than if we just use 70% or 80% of the data for training. The problem is that if we use all the data for training, we can no longer evaluate the true performance of our model in an unbiased fashion. Sure, we can evaluate the model on the data that it was trained on, but this would be problematic. To understand why, let’s look at a practical example. -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了!ChatGPT 翻译能力测试
-
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了! -
本社区终于可以向 @ChatGPT 提问了!